2.1, 4. A) For part A of question 4:
The above photo is Auto. With a shutter speed of 1/40, aperture of F4.0, and ISO of 160.
The above photo is Poster effect. With a shutter speed of 1/8, aperture of F3.5, and ISO of 800.
The above photo is Auto. With a shutter speed of 1/15, aperture of F3.5, and ISO of 1600.
The above photo is Auto. With a shutter speed of 1/15, aperture of F3.5, and ISO of 1600.
B) for part B of question 4: I would say that the Super vivid image was the most different from the Auto image. The chair looks completely different, you would think that it is a different chair. If they didn't have the same pattern, they would be different in terms of color and brightness. Even the objects around the chair look different, they look brighter. When you compare the settings of the image, only one is the same. The aperture is the same. The Auto image has a higher shutter speed and ISO.
C) for part C of question 4: I would say that the Poster effect image was the least different from the Auto image. If you were to just quickly glance at the photos, they look the same. The main difference is the color and shade of the image. The image with the Poster effect has a darker poster, and the maroon billboard is darker. The shutter speed and ISO are completely different. The Poster effect image has a lower shutter speed and ISO, with the aperture being the same.
D) for part d of question 4: Out of all the different modes, Super vivid was my favorite. I like how bright it made the image. I also liked how it made the colors stand out more.
The above photo is Auto. With a shutter speed of 1/30, aperture of F3.5, and ISO of 400.
As you can see in the two images above, the colors are different. In the first photo, the colors pop and are brighter compared to the second image
.png)
No comments:
Post a Comment